CMV: Throughout all of history, the Majority always oppresses the Minority
I would say this is just something I've notice thanks to my interest in history. The sheer amount of examples is just overwhelming. The Tutsi and Hutu, catholics and protestants (the oppressed and oppresser change depending on the country it is happening in), Christians and Jews, Russians and Ukrainians, Europeans and Natives. All of this has made me belive that, no matter the origin or beliefs of any kind of group, so long as they are in the majority, they will find a why to oppress another minority group. I would say that this falls under the whole US vs THEM thing, where the only difference between two groups that is nessasery for conflict is the fact that the two groups are not each other. I've posted this mostly because I was feeling a bit depressed about the idea of this (I don't have depression but it did make me feel a bit sad).
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: Death awaits you with nasty, big, pointy teeth if you keep doing this to me!
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here.
the follow-through is what will decide this Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Hard to say where this lands long term.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Not convinced this is settled yet.