CMV: There should be third party/watchdog investigators for any federal shootings, and the FBI should NOT be allowed to
I just recently read that the FBI is stopping local Minnesota investigators from investigating the shooting that occurred. So the FBI will be investigating the DHS, while both are pushing agendas in unison.
I believe that this should not be legal whatsoever. I think it's akin to police departments investigating themselves and finding no evidence of wrongdoing. (I personally saw this happening in New Orleans during Katrina).
I also believe there should always be a third-party investigator or team to handle these types of events, given the risks of internal corruption.
By having a third party work in conjunction with a watchdog organization, I believe justice would prevail, yielding more transparent and conclusive results for citizens like you and me.
Change my view
UPDATE: This should be implemented in the real world, and here is a brief concept of how it could be feasible.
A non-profit could be started and via donations, attract investigators, forensics specialists, legal aids/lawyers/advocates, and security. This would bypass the need to bend to political pressures. That organization would be created with the sole ability to respond to these shootings, where ethics would be questi
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
the way this is presented changes how it lands
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Its that simple
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Curious how this plays out.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: me_irl
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Im not a cheater just an embarrassed idiot. Also Im scared a friend will send something stupid or if someone hacks my phone to put something bad without me knowing.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next.
the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next.