CMV: There should be third party/watchdog investigators for any federal shootings, and the FBI should NOT be allowed to
I just recently read that the FBI is stopping local Minnesota investigators from investigating the shooting that occurred. So the FBI will be investigating the DHS, while both are pushing agendas in unison.
I believe that this should not be legal whatsoever. I think it's akin to police departments investigating themselves and finding no evidence of wrongdoing. (I personally saw this happening in New Orleans during Katrina).
I also believe there should always be a third-party investigator or team to handle these types of events, given the risks of internal corruption.
By having a third party work in conjunction with a watchdog organization, I believe justice would prevail, yielding more transparent and conclusive results for citizens like you and me.
Change my view
UPDATE: This should be implemented in the real world, and here is a brief concept of how it could be feasible.
A non-profit could be started and via donations, attract investigators, forensics specialists, legal aids/lawyers/advocates, and security. This would bypass the need to bend to political pressures. That organization would be created with the sole ability to respond to these shootings, where ethics would be questi
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.