CMV: There should be third party/watchdog investigators for any federal shootings, and the FBI should NOT be allowed to
I just recently read that the FBI is stopping local Minnesota investigators from investigating the shooting that occurred. So the FBI will be investigating the DHS, while both are pushing agendas in unison.
I believe that this should not be legal whatsoever. I think it's akin to police departments investigating themselves and finding no evidence of wrongdoing. (I personally saw this happening in New Orleans during Katrina).
I also believe there should always be a third-party investigator or team to handle these types of events, given the risks of internal corruption.
By having a third party work in conjunction with a watchdog organization, I believe justice would prevail, yielding more transparent and conclusive results for citizens like you and me.
Change my view
UPDATE: This should be implemented in the real world, and here is a brief concept of how it could be feasible.
A non-profit could be started and via donations, attract investigators, forensics specialists, legal aids/lawyers/advocates, and security. This would bypass the need to bend to political pressures. That organization would be created with the sole ability to respond to these shootings, where ethics would be questi
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: One does not simply resist clicking the tongs. Embrace carcinization.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: The fastest path to emptiness
this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart
Yeah, that's a no-brainer. The FBI needs rules and oversight too. Let other people verify those pesky investigations before they roll out the red carpet for whoever it is. Plus, how else do you catch all the biases and flaws
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl