cmv: The vast majority of US politicians represent their constituents pretty closely and are not bought and paid for by
I do see the government as polarized, partisan, and dysfunctional. Don't get me wrong there. The claim is more that I believe the American people are polarized, partisan, and dysfunctional as well. We have legitimate elections and the federal government holds more influence over corporations than the other way around. I've heard some of the counter arguments of course. Corporate lobbying and the "revolving door" makes sense to me. Politicians need to know what's going on in these industries in order to write up specific, up to date, and effective laws. The donor class isn't in control of elections imo. The candidate with less money wins quite a bit in American politics. Donors who fund Democrats and Republicans? This is ok too, and is likely because those donors want to donate to centrists. Try me with your best points. The claim is genuine, but I'm open to being wrong.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: problem solved
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: See y'all then
Reaction: Me_irl
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: Stay safe
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Its been 3 years since I last saw morning
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this
this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: The adjective for metal is metallic, but not so for iron
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me.