CMV: The US is invading Venezuela to stockpile oil for an an incoming war with Europe (and maybe Canada)
The US has just invaded Venezuela and in the words of their own president: "they will provide us with 30-50million barrels of oil."
I don't believe that is because they wish to sell the oil to earn money. I believe they are going to try to avoid the same fate Germany ended up in, having to divert resources just to keep their war apparatus going. I believe their plan is to try to stockpile as much oil as possible, to be able to maintain a functional logistical chain for as long as possible. The United States Military is not powerful because they have 'highly technological' weapons. They are powerful because of their impressive logistics. The machine gun is not dangerous. The trucks running the ammo, the trains transporting the trucks fuel, and the forklift loading everything onto the train *is* .
The US admin is not stupid, it's dangerous to think of your enemy as unintelligent. They know that they have never attacked a well equipped military, and that this will require a lot more resources than previous conflicts. They know that if they attack Greenland, then Europe has no choice but to remove access to their bases, stop trade, and (if we aren't posturing) defend Greenlanders right
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Remember The Darkness games and Prey 2006..Yeah I do.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: Just...why??
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: Reddits privacy feature is so useless
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: Too real..
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: very shocking
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
the follow-through is what will decide this
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: me_irl
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Not convinced this is settled yet.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this Time will tell.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.