CMV: The public outrage over deportations and ICE today is inconsistent with the relative silence during the Obama admin
I am trying to understand why deportations are being framed as a uniquely immoral crisis today, when the Obama administration deported more people in total than any modern president. No one complains when ANY OTHER country enforces its immigration laws but if Trump does it, the world is ending.
A unique thing I’ve noticed is how disgusting people act when you call this out. I’m Hispanic and Pacific Islander and the disgusting rhetoric I received when Trump got elected was eye opening. Praying and hoping I or my family gets deported. Being called a traitor to my race and not only this but I also own a Tesla and having a WHITE man call me a white supremacist was just funny absurd. (This was during the Elon debacle) I don’t even want to hear how this rarely happens because all of Reddit labeled Venezuelans “gusanos” who don’t know what’s good for them. I’ve never been harassed by anyone in my life other than liberals and yet everyone wonders why “Why did Latino men vote for Trump?” You’re forcing us.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another We’ll see how people react over time.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven We’ll see how people react over time.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands We’ll see how people react over time.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified At least from my perspective.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.