CMV: The public outrage over deportations and ICE today is inconsistent with the relative silence during the Obama admin
I am trying to understand why deportations are being framed as a uniquely immoral crisis today, when the Obama administration deported more people in total than any modern president. No one complains when ANY OTHER country enforces its immigration laws but if Trump does it, the world is ending.
A unique thing I’ve noticed is how disgusting people act when you call this out. I’m Hispanic and Pacific Islander and the disgusting rhetoric I received when Trump got elected was eye opening. Praying and hoping I or my family gets deported. Being called a traitor to my race and not only this but I also own a Tesla and having a WHITE man call me a white supremacist was just funny absurd. (This was during the Elon debacle) I don’t even want to hear how this rarely happens because all of Reddit labeled Venezuelans “gusanos” who don’t know what’s good for them. I’ve never been harassed by anyone in my life other than liberals and yet everyone wonders why “Why did Latino men vote for Trump?” You’re forcing us.
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so This could age very differently in a week.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
the follow-through is what will decide this At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this feels more about execution than intent Not convinced this is settled yet.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context.
the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back
this feels rushed rather than thought through This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This could age very differently in a week.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on
this solves one problem while creating another We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet.