CMV: The only safe chance for change in America is the upcoming midterms. Civil unrest will make the authoritarianism ir
I keep seeing posts alluding to revolution or political violence on the front page. While I do believe anger of this magnitude is warranted given recent events (ESPECIALLY with the ICE shooting and the admins handling of it), I think a campaign of civil unrest will inevitably play into the administrations hand.
The administration knows that it will be the end of them this midterm. I mean, they know they are losing popular support, just look at the gerrymandering in states like Texas. They have failed to achieve their biggest campaign promise, solving the cost of living crisis. On top of that, scandle after scandle just keep getting worse; not that previous controversy swayed voters last time around. The only hope for them to hold onto power is to suspend the election using the insurrection act or to rig the election (which is very difficult to get away with due to its decentralization).
Trump tried to send the national guard into cities in order to start a confrontation but was refused. Now, they have sent their ICE brigade (who are personally loyal to trump and are WILLING to start shit unlike the NG who are mostly just doing a job) into Minneapolis to terrorise people. It isn't a
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here.
this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like there’s more coming here.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through Curious how this plays out.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out.
the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent We’ll see how people react over time.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time.
this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this depends heavily on what happens next
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned
the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
this solves one problem while creating another
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.