CMV: The ICE agent and woman who got shot were both in the wrong
To be honest about my bias, I want to preface this by saying that I'm not really a fan of what ICE is doing in general. But I don't really think that's relevant. I will try to separate my personal views from this as much as possible.
I think it is dumb to drive near a cop (or anyone with gun) like that, even if the ICE agent was mostly at fault. If a cop is giving you orders, it is stupid not to listen to them.
I also think that the ICE agent didn't need to shoot her. He could've just tried stepping out of the way, especially since it looked like she was trying to leave. I think that both of them could have prevented what happened that day.
To change my view, you can explain how either of them was in the right in this situation.
this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: lock in chat
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to
this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this solves one problem while creating another Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.