CMV: The additional footage of the Minneapolis shooting will not change anyone’s mind.
The incentive to pick a side in this modern day idiocracy is too strong. You must use the limited information and exploit it to grandstand or justify your moral superiority and outrage. That goes for bad actors on the right and the left.
Honestly, if we cannot even come to terms that a situation can have shades of grey and seriously complexity and multiple mistakes by all involved, how can we have a discussion? I expect many of the replies here essentially grandstanding or posturing calling for the heads of ICE or the anointing of the late Ms. Good, who likely did not want to be martyred for any movement.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands Curious how this plays out.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like there’s more coming here.
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another
the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Let’s see what happens next.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another Curious how this plays out.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Interested to see the follow-up.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands Others will probably see it differently.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.