CMV: Rap Music is holding back marginalized communities and promotes drugs, bigotry & violence.
Rap music has long been celebrated as a powerful form of artistic expression and a vehicle for marginalized voices to share their stories. It reflects the struggles, triumphs, and realities of communities often ignored by mainstream media. However, the dominant narratives in male-centered mainstream rap have also contributed to reinforcing harmful behaviors and attitudes in marginalized communities. By glamorizing violence, normalizing drug use, and perpetuating bigotry—particularly homophobia—rap has, in many ways, held back the very communities it originated from.
One of the most significant ways rap influences behavior is through its portrayal of violence and hypermasculinity. Many mainstream songs emphasize aggression, dominance, and “street credibility,” framing respect and success as the product of toughness or retaliation. While these themes often reflect real-life struggles and environments, their repeated glorification reinforces a culture where conflict is normalized and alternative paths to success are undervalued. Young listeners, looking for models of behavior, may internalize these messages, perpetuating cycles of interpersonal and community violence.
Rap also frequen
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Hard to say where this lands long term.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Me_irl
the way this is presented changes how it lands Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit Let’s see what happens next.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: The great meme reset
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this
Reaction: me_irl
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me_irl
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move We’ll see how people react over time.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.