CMV: Purpose and Meaning are not important at all, and a desperate need to find either is generally a sign of low self w
I think human life is inherently "worth it", it needs no greater explanation. Your particular life doesn't need purpose or meaning, neither does humanity as a whole. Some people just need it to feel better about themselves because they don't value themselves just for existing.
My reason for this is mainly anecdotal. The only people I've ever seen who work to find purpose and meaning don't think life is enough as it is and are unhappy about it. There is also a lot of virtue signaling when people say something gives them purpose.
Lastly, I think life is beautiful as it is. It can be hard and crazy and exhilarating and mind numbing dull and horrible. And every single person is living a completely unique experience and story that never existed and never will exist again. I just think life IS the whole point. Everything else feels like a bit of a circle jerk.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Not convinced this is settled yet.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Interested to see the follow-up.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just how it reads to me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this Hard to say where this lands long term.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
the timing matters more than people admit
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Hard to say where this lands long term.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent Time will tell.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.