CMV: Purpose and Meaning are not important at all, and a desperate need to find either is generally a sign of low self w
I think human life is inherently "worth it", it needs no greater explanation. Your particular life doesn't need purpose or meaning, neither does humanity as a whole. Some people just need it to feel better about themselves because they don't value themselves just for existing.
My reason for this is mainly anecdotal. The only people I've ever seen who work to find purpose and meaning don't think life is enough as it is and are unhappy about it. There is also a lot of virtue signaling when people say something gives them purpose.
Lastly, I think life is beautiful as it is. It can be hard and crazy and exhilarating and mind numbing dull and horrible. And every single person is living a completely unique experience and story that never existed and never will exist again. I just think life IS the whole point. Everything else feels like a bit of a circle jerk.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent Interested to see the follow-up.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context.
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context.