CMV: Overweight/Unattractive women being rejected from “Miami” style clubs aren’t the victims
https://www.reddit.com/r/CringeTikToks/s/YGgrSrW3T7
I saw this post and have seen a few comments about this over the past year, particularly when the body positivity movement was happening. In summary, it’s the complaint that stereotypically attractive women are given special privileges when going to clubs in places like Miami, while unattractive/overweight women are treated worse. It’s always presented as the club are the bad guys and the overweight women are the victims but this isn’t the case at all. If you consider the human dynamics along with the club dynamics the overweight women are actually the perpetrators of their own demise.
**CLUB DYNAMICS**
Let’s analyze the type of club these places are. They are primarily for shallow people to spend irresponsible amounts of money to flex for strangers. As with most clubs, men spend the majority of the money buying drinks and entrance fees. How do they get men there? Women, specifically attractive women. Men generally will go to the clubs which have the greatest amount of attractive women, thus there is an incentive to let attractive women in. They generate customers and by extension revenue.
On the other hand, an unattractive/overwe
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context.
this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what makes this interesting.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back
the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart
the signal is clear, the strategy less so
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart
this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.