CMV: Overweight/Unattractive women being rejected from “Miami” style clubs aren’t the victims
https://www.reddit.com/r/CringeTikToks/s/YGgrSrW3T7
I saw this post and have seen a few comments about this over the past year, particularly when the body positivity movement was happening. In summary, it’s the complaint that stereotypically attractive women are given special privileges when going to clubs in places like Miami, while unattractive/overweight women are treated worse. It’s always presented as the club are the bad guys and the overweight women are the victims but this isn’t the case at all. If you consider the human dynamics along with the club dynamics the overweight women are actually the perpetrators of their own demise.
**CLUB DYNAMICS**
Let’s analyze the type of club these places are. They are primarily for shallow people to spend irresponsible amounts of money to flex for strangers. As with most clubs, men spend the majority of the money buying drinks and entrance fees. How do they get men there? Women, specifically attractive women. Men generally will go to the clubs which have the greatest amount of attractive women, thus there is an incentive to let attractive women in. They generate customers and by extension revenue.
On the other hand, an unattractive/overwe
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s just how it reads to me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately Curious how this plays out.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split Curious how this plays out.
the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome At least from my perspective.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here We’ll see how people react over time.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Not convinced this is settled yet.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome At least from my perspective.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.