CMV: Nothing will change in America unless there is a mass re-education campaign put forth by the govt post Trump
Just electing a Democrat to office and thinking everything will be okay again is an extremely naive take Americans have.
These issues and furthermore the reasons why Trump won two terms is because fundamentally we live in 2 different countries.
Side A) we have coastal elites, they prioritize collectivism, a euro-centric society, and prioritize critical thinking/higher education
Side B) we have rural communities, they prioritize individualism, generally speaking they dislike euro-centric societies (aka anti collectivism), and are anti-intellectual.
These two sides simply cannot co-exist productively, but it’s because of the “states-rights” nature of education that has led to such a cultural divide over time
Inherently the anti intellectualism makes rural communities extremely susceptible to propaganda and extremism. To boot, their geographic isolation from global issues makes it difficult for them to empathize with anyone other than their community.
Fundamentally this issue has existed much longer than the last 20 or so years. Since reconstruction school systems in the south have told lie after lie about slavery being “a choice” or “not all that bad” or even calling the civil war th
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: problem solved
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: me_irl
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out.
Reaction: me_irl
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Those Actors Were Hella Exhausted
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here At least from my perspective.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. Time will tell.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Is it just me?
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
this solves one problem while creating another Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: Me_irl
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Death awaits you with nasty, big, pointy teeth if you keep doing this to me!
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
Honestly, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: Google Assistant starts a conversation without anyone asking
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts Not convinced this is settled yet.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That part stands out.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable Hard to say where this lands long term.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent Curious how this plays out.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.