CMV: Nothing will change in America unless there is a mass re-education campaign put forth by the govt post Trump
Just electing a Democrat to office and thinking everything will be okay again is an extremely naive take Americans have.
These issues and furthermore the reasons why Trump won two terms is because fundamentally we live in 2 different countries.
Side A) we have coastal elites, they prioritize collectivism, a euro-centric society, and prioritize critical thinking/higher education
Side B) we have rural communities, they prioritize individualism, generally speaking they dislike euro-centric societies (aka anti collectivism), and are anti-intellectual.
These two sides simply cannot co-exist productively, but it’s because of the “states-rights” nature of education that has led to such a cultural divide over time
Inherently the anti intellectualism makes rural communities extremely susceptible to propaganda and extremism. To boot, their geographic isolation from global issues makes it difficult for them to empathize with anyone other than their community.
Fundamentally this issue has existed much longer than the last 20 or so years. Since reconstruction school systems in the south have told lie after lie about slavery being “a choice” or “not all that bad” or even calling the civil war th
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent Time will tell.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
this depends heavily on what happens next
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Not convinced this is settled yet.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split Time will tell.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.