CMV: National Ranked Choice Voting should replace the Electoral College & within congressional races
As my post implies ranked choice voting should be implemented in the United States in place of the electoral college, as well as for congressional races.
It promotes third-parties, as people are more likely to vote for someone, when they know their vote isn't wasted, and ensures they don't end up promoting the "greater of two evils". It gives independents a voice, and gets rid of the electoral college, that gives people of certain states more power than others, while *actually* ensuring that the candidate with *majority* support gets elected. I
In the Senate and the House, it will lead to third parties gaining support and some seats, ultimately leading to multi-party coalitions while ensuring local representation.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
the timing matters more than people admit Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just my read on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next We’ll see how people react over time.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just how it reads to me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent Not convinced this is settled yet.
this comes across more reactive than planned Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do Hard to say where this lands long term.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s just how it reads to me.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the impression it gives me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next.
this depends heavily on what happens next At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands Not convinced this is settled yet.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone