CMV: National Ranked Choice Voting should replace the Electoral College & within congressional races
As my post implies ranked choice voting should be implemented in the United States in place of the electoral college, as well as for congressional races.
It promotes third-parties, as people are more likely to vote for someone, when they know their vote isn't wasted, and ensures they don't end up promoting the "greater of two evils". It gives independents a voice, and gets rid of the electoral college, that gives people of certain states more power than others, while *actually* ensuring that the candidate with *majority* support gets elected. I
In the Senate and the House, it will lead to third parties gaining support and some seats, ultimately leading to multi-party coalitions while ensuring local representation.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the timing matters more than people admit Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this Curious how this plays out.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the timing matters more than people admit
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Time will tell.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately That’s the impression it gives me.
this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Curious how this plays out.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to Curious how this plays out.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do
this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through Interested to see the follow-up.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands Curious how this plays out.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.