CMV: National Ranked Choice Voting should replace the Electoral College & within congressional races
As my post implies ranked choice voting should be implemented in the United States in place of the electoral college, as well as for congressional races.
It promotes third-parties, as people are more likely to vote for someone, when they know their vote isn't wasted, and ensures they don't end up promoting the "greater of two evils". It gives independents a voice, and gets rid of the electoral college, that gives people of certain states more power than others, while *actually* ensuring that the candidate with *majority* support gets elected. I
In the Senate and the House, it will lead to third parties gaining support and some seats, ultimately leading to multi-party coalitions while ensuring local representation.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
the wording alone shifts how people read this We’ll see how people react over time.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet.
the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels more about execution than intent Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate