CMV: Most people in america have no clue how to hate correctly
People hate on white people for existing because of slavery and colonization, blacks for crime statistics and recent viral events, muslims for 9/11 and sharia law, hispanics for drug trafficking, somalis for largescale fraud, jews for the palestine war, asians for covid. Every race has their undeniable problems, but people arent hating correctly. Cheering for protesters out in the street getting run over is wrong, but in the same strain cheering for people such as charlie kirk getting shot is also wrong. Cheering for mosques burning down, churches getting shot up, illegal immigrants getting sent to honduras, praying ice agents all die, are all wrong.
Celebrating the opposing parties members harm isnt some noble act. We have been dehumanizing people we dont agree with for too long and thats what allows so many radical offshoots manifest.
Im not saying its wrong to hate these groups of people, i just think that dehumanizing our opponents allows for more tragic losses to occur and celebrating those deaths as “well thats one down lets shoot for rest of them” is what lets it keep going.
Before you ask, yes i voted for trump, yes i dont like nearly everything hes done besides taking out
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Time will tell.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just how it reads to me.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
this depends heavily on what happens next We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
this depends heavily on what happens next Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.