CMV: Jackson Hinkle would make a better US president than any other political figure today
I'm not saying I agree with him on everything. I am saying that his leadership in total, would do better on foreign and domestic policy for the both the US and the world.
First reason I think this, is foreign policy. He can be 100% trusted to not start any more foreign wars. He won't try to invade cuba, venezuela, iran or anywhere. This will mean that no US soldiers or foriegners get killed and we save alot of money too. The only potential downside I can think of, is that he will totally cut US aid to ukraine. However the current US aid to Ukraine is pretty small anyway, and this doesn't outweigh the upsides.
Second reason is domestic policy. I think after ending foreign conflicts he will reinvest in the economy, building highspeed rail and stuff and creating job. Trump said he'd do this, but obviously lied, but I think hinkle actually would. He has more of an ideological commitment to. He's also going to break up and nationalise big monopolies, like water, healthcare ect. Most of the people in his party seem to be pretty pragmatic and smart on economic issues, supporting a true mixed economy.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through Time will tell.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts
the way this is presented changes how it lands
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
the way this is presented changes how it lands This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me This could age very differently in a week.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Not convinced this is settled yet.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.