CMV: Jackson Hinkle would make a better US president than any other political figure today
I'm not saying I agree with him on everything. I am saying that his leadership in total, would do better on foreign and domestic policy for the both the US and the world.
First reason I think this, is foreign policy. He can be 100% trusted to not start any more foreign wars. He won't try to invade cuba, venezuela, iran or anywhere. This will mean that no US soldiers or foriegners get killed and we save alot of money too. The only potential downside I can think of, is that he will totally cut US aid to ukraine. However the current US aid to Ukraine is pretty small anyway, and this doesn't outweigh the upsides.
Second reason is domestic policy. I think after ending foreign conflicts he will reinvest in the economy, building highspeed rail and stuff and creating job. Trump said he'd do this, but obviously lied, but I think hinkle actually would. He has more of an ideological commitment to. He's also going to break up and nationalise big monopolies, like water, healthcare ect. Most of the people in his party seem to be pretty pragmatic and smart on economic issues, supporting a true mixed economy.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Feels like there’s more coming here.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split
the signal is clear, the strategy less so
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified We’ll see how people react over time.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Others will probably see it differently.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like there’s more coming here.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on
this solves one problem while creating another That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here.
this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just how it reads to me.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That part stands out.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This could age very differently in a week.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled At least from my perspective.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me
this feels rushed rather than thought through
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split That’s just how it reads to me.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit That’s just how it reads to me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore
this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.