CMV: Income tax should be Illegal.
CMV: Income tax should Be illegal.
I don't think Income Tax in today's day and age is reasonable or fair to the working class citizens. I think income Tax shouldn't exist. If its an absolute necessity that the stability of the country relies on it then it should be decreased immensely. I don't think it benefits anyone at all. I can't control what the government deems the amount to be taken out of my check is. Aside from the fact that if I work overtime a majority of it the government takes anyways. So in my view as an able bodied working citizen I see no benefit to me or any kind of fairness.
My solution:
- increase taxes on goods
My thought process:
- I can control what I spend.
- I can't control what uncle Sam takes out of my check.
Please Express if you agree or disagree
I genuinely want to observe the disagreeing opinion and genuinely want to see it from the disagreeings perspective.
Im am open minded no aggression please im just curious.
(Note: i am not demo or repub) please disregard any presidential bias.
Located (FL)
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next Curious how this plays out.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this
this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately