cmv: if Instagram proved anything, it is that every body type is loved, just not by people who they want them to love th
They said men want only super feminine and thin, short to mid height women for decades and there was a very strong activism about it. But looking at Instagram and women who share themselves as main focus (as in not art or travels or work, but their own looks, photos);
Very tall women have massive follower counts.
Very muscular women have very big follower counts.
Very masculine looking women have very big follower counts.
Very short haired women have very big follower counts.
Very hairy women have very big follower counts.
Very overweight women have very big follower counts.
Only thing it isn't always the type of guys who are following, liking and commenting on their posts.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: me_irl
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: W MOM
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Me_irl
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy This could age very differently in a week.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Hard to say where this lands long term.