CMV: I don’t see a point in caring
Every single day I see hundreds if not thousands of posts on (this groups) rights and (this groups) rights. I see post about what we (US) are doing elsewhere ect. And I read both sides of the argument and watch both sides turn to name calling and even threats and despite all that I just don’t care.
Is it effecting me? No? Then I don’t care. I just can’t comprehend why anyone would give a shit about anything other than themselves and their loved ones.
Before I’m labeled as a racist or nazi or whatever I’ll get this out of the way.
Me: white male
Wife: disabled white female
Son: white male dating non binary person who I think the world of
These are the people I care about and nothing that is happening does anything to them.
So seriously why do you all care so much about people you don’t and won’t ever know? Why reduce yourself to such anger and despair of shit you literally cannot change?
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned Hard to say where this lands long term.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the impression it gives me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do Time will tell.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Feels like there’s more coming here.
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next Others will probably see it differently.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Not convinced this is settled yet.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
the signal is clear, the strategy less so This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like there’s more coming here.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
From my side, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do Not convinced this is settled yet.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out.
the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This probably isn’t the last word on it.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out.
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another This could age very differently in a week.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here.
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like there’s more coming here.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
this solves one problem while creating another Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like there’s more coming here.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Not convinced this is settled yet.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. Time will tell.
this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to