CMV: I disagree with the characterization of chipolte and similar restaurants as "slop bowls"
[Background information here](https://i.imgur.com/o8gyfbj.png)
1. The food in these restaurants is typically healthy, or at least more healthy than comparable fast food
2. The food is usually made from quality, whole ingredients. Rather than preserved ingredients, emulsified ingredients, or heavily processed ingredients
3. When we look at these restaurants, we should compare them to similar fast food chains. They should not be compared to higher tier dining, nor home cooking
4. When compared to similar restaurants, we see that restaurants like chipolte or cava typically serve food of better quality, which should mean that they are not 'slop' for their category
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Time will tell.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just how it reads to me.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent Hard to say where this lands long term.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this feels more about execution than intent
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next Let’s see what happens next.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
this feels rushed rather than thought through Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting.
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here.
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
the timing matters more than people admit That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Curious how this plays out.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just how it reads to me.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated
this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here.
this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately