CMV: I disagree with the characterization of chipolte and similar restaurants as "slop bowls"
[Background information here](https://i.imgur.com/o8gyfbj.png)
1. The food in these restaurants is typically healthy, or at least more healthy than comparable fast food
2. The food is usually made from quality, whole ingredients. Rather than preserved ingredients, emulsified ingredients, or heavily processed ingredients
3. When we look at these restaurants, we should compare them to similar fast food chains. They should not be compared to higher tier dining, nor home cooking
4. When compared to similar restaurants, we see that restaurants like chipolte or cava typically serve food of better quality, which should mean that they are not 'slop' for their category
the follow-through is what will decide this Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here.
At first glance, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split
Absolutely, that's a fair assessment
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through Curious how this plays out.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
Reaction: Title*
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
this feels more about execution than intent Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: me_irl
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Something I've observed
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Not convinced this is settled yet.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: me irl
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
Reaction: W MOM
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
the follow-through is what will decide this At least from my perspective.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting.
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
the follow-through is what will decide this
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it.