CMV: I disagree with the characterization of chipolte and similar restaurants as "slop bowls"
[Background information here](https://i.imgur.com/o8gyfbj.png)
1. The food in these restaurants is typically healthy, or at least more healthy than comparable fast food
2. The food is usually made from quality, whole ingredients. Rather than preserved ingredients, emulsified ingredients, or heavily processed ingredients
3. When we look at these restaurants, we should compare them to similar fast food chains. They should not be compared to higher tier dining, nor home cooking
4. When compared to similar restaurants, we see that restaurants like chipolte or cava typically serve food of better quality, which should mean that they are not 'slop' for their category
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this solves one problem while creating another Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split Time will tell.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Its so lame which is why I dont watch him no more because to lose by something out of your control is so lame. Imagine if shows like Ninja Warrior were the only way to win was by the audienc
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: me_irl
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: Just always
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: He belongs to her now.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: Me_irl
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through