CMV: I can't see how a realistic progressive welfare state like what AOC or Bernie think of is possible anymore.
So a problem that europe is facing right now is that they pension system is way too large for they amount of workers. I heard somewhere there is gonna be 2 pensioner for 1 worker in France. I think this would depress they birth rate further as high taxes plus having to take care of grandparents will make people have to deal with have less time to have kids thus repeating they cycle, while yes ai will reduce labor requirements, A,I can't stimulate demand as a robot can't buy stuff from a market etc. I also heard that religious people and extremely religious people have more kids. They thing is leftist don't tend to be they people how are extremely religious or have kids as much as conservatives exactly plan to have a welfare state which requires a ton of young people but don't have kids , before you ask no taxing they rich would not solve this as France and every Europe country tax their people more but they also have a brain drain and it hard to generate as much wealth as america so they successful leave thus putting more strain on their system. Immigration won't fix it as they global birth rate is going down. I use ai to fix my spelling
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Curious how this plays out.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
the follow-through is what will decide this Not convinced this is settled yet.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Time will tell.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to
the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable Hard to say where this lands long term.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
this depends heavily on what happens next Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this depends heavily on what happens next Time will tell.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this
this solves one problem while creating another Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This probably isn’t the last word on it.