CMV: "Every case is different / ask your doctor" is gatekeeping bs
This is most commonly seen with law firms / healthcare providers, where they publish a general article about some question and end with this to encourage a consultation. I consider this gatekeeping because I assume / it is reasonable to assume that every profession has an SOP (Standard Operating Procedure), i.e. a series of "If this Then that, Else ((nested) If this Then that, Else...)".
For example, for every case a lawyer will handle, there will be some applicable law. Because the law defines the condition for someone to be considered guilty, the lawyer just applies the conditions to find feasible defenses. For the sake of this discussion, case law is treated the same as statutory law. Thus, lawyers just "execute" a series of "if-else" statements.
It's the same for doctors. A doctor orders a series of labs (or observe symptoms), and based on those ("If-else") make diagnosis or prescribe medication (and decide dosage).
TLDR: "Every case / everyone is different" is not true. Almost everything (or at least the most common things) can be described as a bunch of "If-else"'s, thus the claim of "uniqueness" is simply gatekeeping and a way to generate revenue.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next Curious how this plays out.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands We’ll see how people react over time.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Some times the dankmemes are found and not created
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: Something I've observed
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Curious how this plays out.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: Title*
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Not convinced this is settled yet.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
Reaction: Something I've observed
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next
the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Reaction: Hate when it happens
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
Reaction: Me_irl
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent We’ll see how people react over time.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: The great meme reset
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.