CMV: "Every case is different / ask your doctor" is gatekeeping bs
This is most commonly seen with law firms / healthcare providers, where they publish a general article about some question and end with this to encourage a consultation. I consider this gatekeeping because I assume / it is reasonable to assume that every profession has an SOP (Standard Operating Procedure), i.e. a series of "If this Then that, Else ((nested) If this Then that, Else...)".
For example, for every case a lawyer will handle, there will be some applicable law. Because the law defines the condition for someone to be considered guilty, the lawyer just applies the conditions to find feasible defenses. For the sake of this discussion, case law is treated the same as statutory law. Thus, lawyers just "execute" a series of "if-else" statements.
It's the same for doctors. A doctor orders a series of labs (or observe symptoms), and based on those ("If-else") make diagnosis or prescribe medication (and decide dosage).
TLDR: "Every case / everyone is different" is not true. Almost everything (or at least the most common things) can be described as a bunch of "If-else"'s, thus the claim of "uniqueness" is simply gatekeeping and a way to generate revenue.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this Let’s see what happens next.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Let’s see what happens next.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart We’ll see how people react over time.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next.
this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
this depends heavily on what happens next We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.