CMV: Current admin doesn't care about reelection
\*\*EDIT/TLDR\*\*: Wish I could've worded the title better. By reelection I mean chances for the next Republican candidate. My thesis is they (trump obviously but also the current faction of Republicans who control all the keys to power which includes many potential 2028 candidates) care about is staying in power now, but not beyond 2028. The midterms just need to be not catastrophic. The idea is permanently shifting the political/economic/power landscape is more powerful than one or two elections. There's dirt to do, and until Trump there has not been a president as willing to push the boundaries and have the base to survive it, so the main goal is to take advantage of the window now, not after 2028. There is no long term thinking, no decade long plan to "restore Monroe doctrine" or "economic nationalism". Those are just narratives used to gaslight to make it seem like all of this is done for some eventual greater good (which has a stabilizing effect at least in the short term since it preserves the base and leaves a lot of moderates confused of what to make of the situation). There is no 4-D chess game with China, or at the very least that is nowhere near the main motive. The onl
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated
this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me.
this solves one problem while creating another Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Time will tell.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated
Reaction: Pepe in the cupboard
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore
Reaction: me_irl
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Let’s see what happens next.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Too real..
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Its that simple
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split
Reaction: me_irl
this feels rushed rather than thought through
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Hard to say where this lands long term.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just how it reads to me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: If I were them, Id hurry up.
this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: When the villian catches the hero:
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Reaction: Some times the dankmemes are found and not created
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: lock in chat
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent
Reaction: Me_irl
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Reddits privacy feature is so useless
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: literally 1984
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me
Reaction: very shocking
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Let’s see what happens next.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Too real..
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Reaction: me_irl
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: The great meme reset
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Curious how this plays out.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: lock in chat
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: Just always
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.