CMV: American companies should not be allowed to hire foreign citizens in any capacity
There should be absolutely no reason why American companies should hire foreign labor in any capacity. There is often the term “Labor shortage” being thrown around and frankly it is insulting. There are 10,000,000’s of professions outsourced off shore or given to temporary residents stateside. Why was it cheaper to live in the 50’s compared to today if offshoring “Reduces the price of goods to the consumer”. The argument that we need these programs to attract world talent is dumb as well, if they were such geniuses that we needed programs to attract them just make those individuals naturalized citizens and skip the H1B process entirely. At least that way when their H1B visa inevitably expires, they won’t brain drain back into their respective countries
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Time will tell.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: W MOM
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.