CMV: All jobs should have health insurance, even part-time
This post is specifically about the US. I know that a lot of other countries already have free healthcare.
I think the government should force companies to offer health insurance benefits to all their employees, even part-time workers. **Of course, the government could also implement universal healthcare, but I don't have much faith in them doing that anytime soon, so I think this solution would work for now.**
I think it's kind of ridiculous that you could work a job (any job) and not get health insurance benefits. As of right now, companies over a certain size have to offer their full-time workers health insurance benefits, but they get around this by scheduling people part-time so they don't have to pay for it.
This would also be good for the economy since there would be more healthy workers. Also, someone who's disabled (or otherwise preoccupied) might say something like, "I can manage working part-time at Starbucks (or wherever)" because now they don't have to worry about losing their Medicaid benefits and therefore their health insurance.
In anticipation of counterarguments, an exception might be made for small businesses since I don't know if they could afford it. But big bu
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next.
From my side, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: We Laugh At the 828-Meter Building!
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: Conformity Gate
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: lock in chat
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: very shocking
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Its been 3 years since I last saw morning
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: me_irl
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Reaction: me_irl
Honestly, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me_irl
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
this solves one problem while creating another Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: Too real..
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.