CMV: All Commuters should be required to live within a 30-minute bus drive to attend their university
# Definitions
* **Commuter school:** A college/university where most students travel to college/university for classes and then go home afterwards because of other responsibilities (e.g. job, family, etc).
* **Social life:** An aspect the college offers to student/faculty/staff members to engage with the university outside of academics (e.g. Student organizations (aka clubs), university-sanctioned events (e.g. college sports, music concerts, etc.), parties, traditions (new or existing).
# My Thoughts
It's not uncommon for my university to have students commuting at least 30 minutes to 2 hours to arrive to the university or depart back to their homes. Forcing all of those students to live within a 30-minute bus drive from campus is ultimately necessary because there are academics studies that found that driving affect one's physical and mental health, so not only would this solution cut down the need for them to commute but also reduce the overall traffic of the city. Why travel that long when one can go to another university that will offer the equivalent program?
Doing so would, as a result, improve the overall social life of the university because these students would then have t
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Let’s see what happens next.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That part stands out.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just how it reads to me.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit Curious how this plays out.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Interested to see the follow-up.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Interested to see the follow-up.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts
the signal is clear, the strategy less so This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s just how it reads to me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the impression it gives me.
this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
this solves one problem while creating another
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here.
this depends heavily on what happens next This could age very differently in a week.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like there’s more coming here.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this feels more about execution than intent Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do
this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just how it reads to me.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.