CMV: Adult dating is lacking the fun and romantic tension that dating as teenagers had
As a teenager dating used to be exciting and spontaneous. Meeting each other in person and then slowly getting to know each other as friends of friends. The first time she came close to you - even holding hands or her sitting on your lap stirred up big feelings. The big question if you would end up dating or not.
Now its online swiping and then you go on predefined dating encounters. Both know what the point is, you have polite conversation. Like a job interview you kind of find out whether they fit the bill or not. Maybe you go home and have sex but she done that with so many men at this point its not really special anymore. It feels like you are her routine where she kinda does what she always does - probably many men are like this too.
I miss when you could tell it was exciting and special for her to kiss a guy. When the whole thing wasnt a routine game. It used to be that girls dressed up to impress guys and guys tried hard to look cool for the ladies. As adults now its like no one really tries or cares - everyone is too cool for effort. Appealing to others is taboo. Its like all the fun parts need to be toned down in the name of "maturity".
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore
the signal is clear, the strategy less so
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: We Laugh At the 828-Meter Building!
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: Have your insurance people speak to my people
this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Conformity Gate
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately Curious how this plays out.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like there’s more coming here.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just how it reads to me.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.