CMV: Abortion should be limited but still allowed
My opinion on abortion is pretty complex. As a woman myself, I definitely agree that women should have control over their bodies. But also, I am convicted because some people just "don't want to have a kid", so they abort it. It basically takes a child off of the planet because you didn't want to go through 9 months and put it up for adoption. I find it similar to opioids or narcotics: Sure, it's your choice, but, it should be limited to none because it isn't healthy for you/the world/people around you (not saying that people around a person who has had abortion should say anything to them about it).
I also think it should most definitely be allowed in some cases. For example, a 12 year-old who is raped. That child should not have a baby if they don't want to. It's okay to have the baby if you want, and I respect the opinion of those who have, but it shouldn't be forced.
I guess my opinion is pretty in the middle. Please no "spirited" debating in the comments but I am very open to conversation about it.
EDIT: please do not treat me like i am saying there should be a full ban. I believe in body autonomy. Also I am not "anti-abortion" but I am trying to build a valid opinion. I am no
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this At least from my perspective.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just how it reads to me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through We’ll see how people react over time.