CMV: Abortion should be limited but still allowed
My opinion on abortion is pretty complex. As a woman myself, I definitely agree that women should have control over their bodies. But also, I am convicted because some people just "don't want to have a kid", so they abort it. It basically takes a child off of the planet because you didn't want to go through 9 months and put it up for adoption. I find it similar to opioids or narcotics: Sure, it's your choice, but, it should be limited to none because it isn't healthy for you/the world/people around you (not saying that people around a person who has had abortion should say anything to them about it).
I also think it should most definitely be allowed in some cases. For example, a 12 year-old who is raped. That child should not have a baby if they don't want to. It's okay to have the baby if you want, and I respect the opinion of those who have, but it shouldn't be forced.
I guess my opinion is pretty in the middle. Please no "spirited" debating in the comments but I am very open to conversation about it.
EDIT: please do not treat me like i am saying there should be a full ban. I believe in body autonomy. Also I am not "anti-abortion" but I am trying to build a valid opinion. I am no
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like there’s more coming here.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That part stands out.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned At least from my perspective.
the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the impression it gives me.
this depends heavily on what happens next We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just my read on it.
this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.