CMV: 99% (at least) of the people claiming to have DID online are faking it.
EDIT: BY DID I mean dissociative identity disorder.
This is stuff drives me absolutely bananas to see. Absolutely everything I hear from these people about their experience is so ridiculous. All of it is so conveniently fun and quirky. There is absolutely no literature or documented anything about DID working the way these people claim it does until about 2 or 3 years ago I think. It just didn't exist. Nobody had a "system of alters" Nobody had hazbin hotel OC's living inside of their head. There was no plural systems. The actual literature says that only like 6% of people with DID are aware of their "switches" in any capacity. The "alters" do not typically have different names, there are not 38 of them, they do not fit into neat little writing projects. There was no "innerworld" or "Littles" or anything. Now all of the sudden there are like 1000s of people self diagnosing themselves for attention. I think, especially when adults do it, it's just sad and pathetic.
Riddle me this batman, why do I never hear about someone with DID who does anything other than spend every second of their lives in some combination of being on discord, playing video games and watching anime, tik tok, or
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This could age very differently in a week.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Curious how this plays out.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just how it reads to me.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.