Clients TouchScreen Driver always quits working
I am having issues with a clients laptop.
It’s a Fujitsu 3774
The touch screen will quit working. I will disable and re-enable the driver and all is good.
But a few days later the issue repeats itself.
What is going on here?
Are there any scripts I can implement to automatically resolve the issue?
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just how it reads to me.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Interested to see the follow-up.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move We’ll see how people react over time.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified We’ll see how people react over time.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Not convinced this is settled yet.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like there’s more coming here.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated Interested to see the follow-up.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on