Boss wants us to implement Google credential manager instead of a PW manager (Vaultwarden)
Hello,
We are using Entra ID, and majority of users use chrome for browsing. I brought up the idea of hosting a PW manager and was quickly denied because someone said it was cheaper and easier and just as safe to use google credential manager.
I'd create a google cloud identity tenant and give our users gmail accounts to have their PW managers..
From a security standpoint, what is my best argument to say why a dedicated PW manager is more secure for both comliance and security ? Or is it not a big deal ?
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Time will tell.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: me_irl
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: We Laugh At the 828-Meter Building!
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: Me_irl
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.