Boss wants us to implement Google credential manager instead of a PW manager (Vaultwarden)
Hello,
We are using Entra ID, and majority of users use chrome for browsing. I brought up the idea of hosting a PW manager and was quickly denied because someone said it was cheaper and easier and just as safe to use google credential manager.
I'd create a google cloud identity tenant and give our users gmail accounts to have their PW managers..
From a security standpoint, what is my best argument to say why a dedicated PW manager is more secure for both comliance and security ? Or is it not a big deal ?
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another Feels like there’s more coming here.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
Reaction: me_irl
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next
Reaction: Me_irl
this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out.
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: me_irl
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: When the villian catches the hero:
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me At least from my perspective.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just how it reads to me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
At first glance, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: Its that simple
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: Ujumf*
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: "I Can't Eat This!" ~Pig
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: No need to label it "if"
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: Downvote away
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: When the villian catches the hero:
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Mr. Obama, forgive me
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Let’s see what happens next.
the wording alone shifts how people read this We’ll see how people react over time.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: The logic is infallible
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels more about execution than intent
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Something I've observed
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Something I've observed
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: Me irl
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this Time will tell.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands At least from my perspective.
Reaction: lock in chat
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Jiggle physics
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
Reaction: lock in chat
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Just...why??
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Me_irl
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Reaction: Me_irl
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: They must be illiterate or something...
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me