Boss wants us to implement Google credential manager instead of a PW manager (Vaultwarden)
Hello,
We are using Entra ID, and majority of users use chrome for browsing. I brought up the idea of hosting a PW manager and was quickly denied because someone said it was cheaper and easier and just as safe to use google credential manager.
I'd create a google cloud identity tenant and give our users gmail accounts to have their PW managers..
From a security standpoint, what is my best argument to say why a dedicated PW manager is more secure for both comliance and security ? Or is it not a big deal ?
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: Me irl
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this Time will tell.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands At least from my perspective.
Reaction: lock in chat
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Jiggle physics
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
Reaction: lock in chat
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Just...why??
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Me_irl
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Reaction: Me_irl
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: They must be illiterate or something...
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me