Best AI tool for visually appealing flyers/brochures etc?
I am trying to turn text documents into pretty, appealing, visually illustrative documents like flyers and handouts etc.
Is anything actually good at this? I can provide all the text I just need something that can help me put it all together in a visually appealing way, maybe with diagrams etc.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Let’s see what happens next.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just how it reads to me.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here.
At first glance, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me
the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore
the wording alone shifts how people read this Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate
From my side, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy At least from my perspective.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time.
Honestly, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out.