AWS Amazon Q was surprisingly helpful at saving me money
I was doing some end of year audit and noticed the aws bill higher than i thought i should be. Normally this is a PITA to track down orphaned crap and review all the details, but for the sake of laziness i tried out the AWS i guess its called amazon q and it looked into all my costs and helped me track down some orphaned elastic ips and some other noise and save me about 50% of my monthly bill from just left over experimental clutter. Nothing else, just passing along something that i normally would have groaned at dealing with and instead was pleasantly surprised
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
this feels rushed rather than thought through This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next This could age very differently in a week.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Time will tell.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate
the way this is presented changes how it lands Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable