AWS Amazon Q was surprisingly helpful at saving me money
I was doing some end of year audit and noticed the aws bill higher than i thought i should be. Normally this is a PITA to track down orphaned crap and review all the details, but for the sake of laziness i tried out the AWS i guess its called amazon q and it looked into all my costs and helped me track down some orphaned elastic ips and some other noise and save me about 50% of my monthly bill from just left over experimental clutter. Nothing else, just passing along something that i normally would have groaned at dealing with and instead was pleasantly surprised
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Hard to say where this lands long term.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That part stands out.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do Hard to say where this lands long term.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned This could age very differently in a week.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to This probably isn’t the last word on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just my read on it.
the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here.