App that connects people having the same conversation
I’m exploring a design problem around how people find others to talk to about the same thing at the same moment, without relying on forums, tags, or scrolling feeds.
Most discussion platforms ask users to choose the right place to post, such as a subreddit, forum, or channel, or to search and scroll through existing threads. This works well for organizing information, but it can be slow and awkward when someone just wants to talk through an idea in real time.
The concept I’m exploring is simple: **You start any conversation (question, rant, brainstorm, etc.), and an AI instantly connects you with others talking about the same thing — no forums, no tags, just live context-based matching using LLMs.**
Would this be useful or chaotic? What features or limits would make it work?
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Time will tell.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so At least from my perspective.
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next Let’s see what happens next.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the way this is presented changes how it lands Hard to say where this lands long term.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here At least from my perspective.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Curious how this plays out.