activate a 2022 VM on a 2019 hyper-V host that has a 2022 data center license for it?
Hey all,
We are currently running hyper-v on 2019. I need to install a 2022 VM server due to application requirements. the hyper-V servers have 2022 datacenter licensing, but are still on 2019... I dont have time to upgrade the hyper-v hosts at this time.
If we went this route, how could i activate the 2022 VM, because i don't think AVMA works on higher versions than the host, despite being within licensing compliance for it.
Or am I mistaken and this isnt possible?
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
the direction makes sense but the details are messy
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this solves one problem while creating another
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting.
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.