13m empty, useless, hopeless
Woke up today with an odd feeling. I never knew anything about feeling empty and never cried myself to sleep. Well i watched tiktok and ate breakfast, addicted yes. Got an edit of emma watson who i thought like yeah shes very pretty. Lead to me realizing that when she was 13 she was a super popular movie star and im here eating breakfast feeling like a useless npc piece of shit. All of today I've felt empty and cried lots. Just seeing anything of harry potter makes me feel useless and this is not close to all. I have a loving family but i am kind of introverted. Its hard to find what to say so lost of the time i answer correctly or just try to be funny. Theres so many opportunities i get but ignore. I could of been a funny friend that everyoje likes but know im quiet but sometimes not and not really one type of person. Im scared this is the time i start playing videogames to escape reality, not to play for fun😭. Im heavily leaning towards a wall that makes me learn hard math and science to be more intelligent for the future.
Is this crazy weird for 13 and is my mental age fucked or is this normal???
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That part stands out.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Let’s see what happens next.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through We’ll see how people react over time.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through Curious how this plays out.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the way this is presented changes how it lands
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me This could age very differently in a week.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Hard to say where this lands long term.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here.
the timing matters more than people admit
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate
the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Let’s see what happens next.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context.